Why do horror movies make money but not games

Alex HuntsbergerCommunications Specialist October 18, Here on moneg OppLoans Financial Sense blog, we write a lot about how to make your money go farther. Compared to the hundreds of millions of dollars it costs to produce an action blockbuster like, say a Marvel movie or a Star Warhorror movies are relatively inexpensive to make. In fact, the horror genre has never been one that racked up massive production costs. Wyy masks and shadows are both quite cheap. Jason Blum has taken this approach and filed it down to an exceptionally sharp, stabby point.

Trending News

Photo by Peter Bernik via Stocksy. Like around 5 percent of the UK population, I suffer from generalized anxiety disorder. When I was a kid I would worry about certain things—usually catastrophic in scale but blown entirely out of proportion—When I was ten, I learned about comets at a museum. For weeks, I’d lie awake at night worrying that a comet might be heading on a collision course with Earth. These days my anxiety manifests in a way that’s much harder to explain to people who haven’t experienced it: Imagine a sort of mild feeling of dread, a bit like the fear you get when you’re hungover and know you did something but don’t know what. That, but basically all the time. I’m lucky that my anxiety is moderate enough for me to handle it without medication; I rely on regular exercise, not drinking too much, and just keeping tabs on my own mental state on a regular basis. But when it gets really bad, there’s one instant fix that makes me feel better: a horror film. The gorier, darker, and more disturbing, the better. Last week I watched Would You Rather , a low-budget plotless gore-fest with a Netflix rating of two-and-half stars. The cover image is of an razor blade right next to somebody’s eye, about to slice into it. You get the idea.

F**king jump scares

When I first noticed the effectiveness of this unconventional way of coping with anxiety, I pretty much freaked out: What was I, some kind of psychopath who derives comfort from the suffering of others? Is it just me? Is there something wrong with me? While horror films aren’t a true alternative to seeking medical help if you need it, I was nevertheless inundated with responses from people saying they’d noticed the same thing. To find out why some anxious people like me are self-medicating with horror movies, I spoke to Dr. Mathias Clasen from Aarhus University in Denmark. He’s been studying the psychological effects of horror movies for 15 years. Clasen explained. We know it’s not real—or at least, some parts of our brain know it isn’t real. Other parts—ancient structures located in the limbic system—respond as though it were real.

F**king jump scares

Yeah, I’m gonna be blunt about this! So since it’s the first day of the scariest month of the year, why don’t we try to figure out why today’s horror films leave so much to be desired, and how the concept of «scary» has evolved to mean — nothing remotely close to that. Even though the video is almost a year old, the points he brings up are still incredibly relevant. Here are the main points Stuckmann brings up in the video. I promise to try to not sound like an old codger. Get off my damn lawn, jump scares! Sorry — I knew I promised. Seriously, Stuckmann wasn’t lying when he said that this technique is one of the cheapest you can use in a horror film, and let me tell you why. In fact, I can just recite the little spiel I’ve been giving to anyone who’d listen to it for the past several years. Jump scares do not scare.

Don’t Miss:

The Indicator NPR hide caption. It’s just out. Jamie Lee Curtis is back. The original, though, was made back in And it made way more than that. In the U. I would say, Cardiff, that is a scary profit laughter. And this is kind of a unique thing about horror movies. See, the movie business is hard. It is hard to make money. Most movies don’t, except when it comes to horror movies. Today on the show, horror movies — why the business model is less scary for horror movies than it is for other kinds of movies. That is today’s Planet Money indicator. That makes «Paranormal Activity» the movie with the highest return on investment of all time.

Don’t Miss:

They need to follow the original but spice it up with modern problem, without taking away from what made the original ‘good’ in the first place. This is a movie that starts with a child murdering his sister while wearing a clown mask and if that’s not scary, you need your horror fan status revoked immediately. What mismarketing does is create an expectation in the audience that the film can’t fulfill. Instead too much takes away from the film as the viewers become distracted or to grossed out to watch the movie. My God. The important thing is, regardless of their speed, these zombies are still the destroyers of worlds. Show more answers 6. Common not to know of your non-Hodgkin lymphoma? Well, you know that one and I don’t see atheism lurking any time soon.

2. …but also the riskiest

We might have a hit on our hands! Of course, acting needs to be on point as. The movie: Why do horror movies make money but not games movie titles are vague, letting you gradually work out their meaning as the narrative slowly unfurls in front of your eyes like a delicate flower in tea. This is boring. Good article. Probably because the people born after the year often don’t know a good horror film if it came up and bit. Remakes often lack plot or consistency because the producers often think that they are guaranteed to do good due to the number of fans for the originals; remakes are often schemes to moeny quick money. Because Hollywood is running out of ideas, and the ones they come up with are crap. Skip to main content. I for one am not a particular horror movie buff, there’s a ton of recent horror flicks that I still haven’t seen. Get off gamws damn lawn, jump scares! Still have questions? Then they feel like their in the film itself, and actually channel the emotions better.

1. Horror Movies Are the Most Profitable Genre

Yeah, I’m gonna be blunt about this! So since it’s the first day of the scariest month of the year, why don’t we try to figure out why today’s horror films leave so much to be desired, and how the concept of «scary» has evolved to mean — nothing remotely close to. Even though the video is almost a year old, the points he brings up are still incredibly relevant. Here are the main points Stuckmann brings up in the video. I promise to try to not sound like an old codger.

Get off my damn lawn, jump scares! Sorry — I knew I promised. Seriously, Stuckmann wasn’t lying when he said that this technique is one of the cheapest you can use in a horror film, and let me tell you why. In fact, I can moveis recite the little spiel I’ve been dhy to anyone who’d listen to it for the past several years.

Jump scares do not scare. They startle. Being startled is not the same thing as being scared. Being startled is like getting mpney — the pain is sudden and sharp, but you forget about it immediately.

Being scared is like getting stabbed in the gut and having the blade twirl up your intestines like spaghetti — the pain is — quite uncomfortable. I implore all of you horror filmmakers: please, for the love of Michael Meyers, keep your jump scares to a minimum. Horror trailers are notoriously misrepresentative of the the films they are supposed mke be previewing, which is unfortunate for the filmmakers, because they don’t have much control over how their film is marketed.

What mismarketing does is create an expectation in the audience that the film can’t fulfill. But, I’m so glad I was convinced to give it a try, because it wasn’t at all what the trailer made it out to be.

There’s something inherently wrong with this equation. Bad scary movies are like loser romantic hhorror you try to get your friends to break up. Just — why? It’s not just the filmmakers, but also the producers and studio execs that need to give credit and respect to their audiences. And audiences — let’s start remembering what «scary» actually is.

Jorror we? Pretty please? It costs the same to see the worst and the best films of the year. They don’t take your money on the way. I believe the horror movie because of one single reason. This genre is based on supernatural and supernatural beings. Now with the decline of religion youngsters don’t believe in ghosts or evil the way their parents believed butt Exorcists.

The decline of religious people? What did religion have to do with Halloween,the thing,alien and pretty much all of the classic horror films that helped define the genre?

A ddo horror film does not depend on superstitious people. I always find it interesting when people turn assumptions into statements of truth. The world today has never been as defined moviee it is by religious beliefs whj perhaps the vut ages. South American people are dedicated to religion, check the stats. Europe remains Europe, it depends on economic grow. The Middle east? Well, you know that one and I don’t see atheism lurking any time soon. Africa and its 1 billion plus population societies are fundamentally religious.

Chinese people are extremely superstitious — maybe that’s why they love gambling so. And for the first time in History the Pope has addressed to Congress which may reveal that conflicts of ideology are intensifying. As I said, I love assumptions turned into statements of truth. No offense intended to you though, I live in a cosmopolitain city and i’d assume too that the world has evolved.

Now, going back to the article, I think it is an investment issue. Simply put, if something works aka profitable then why change it? We went from Hitchcock — di horror movie master who, surprise, didn’t use the supernatural element much but rather Psychology, as did Kubrick — to Scary Movie, a paragon of dumbness. But that works, it’s cost efficient, no acting required, the script is thin so who cares because it makes money therefore people like it and borror is King.

But actually, I believe that the real «horror» masterpieces of bit last, let’s said two decades, do not fall into the horror genre but embrace a wider spectrum of emotions; such as Jurassic Park, Alien of course, Terminator, Looper a movie of horrific violence, anyone remember that scene where Paul Dano gets chopped off.? It’s a personal opinion but perhaps the Horror genre has dried up.

Werewolves, aliens, vampires, demons, The Devil, viruses, sorcerers, scary animals, vilains, AI All these elements have been already used. Yeah, perhaps it’s dried up a little.

And for the lack of gzmes but because studios ought to keep on producing them for various purposes Halloween, marketing and because people wanna see a gamess movie once in a whilewell, we’ve got not so good Horror genre movies using systemically the same tricks running off the stairs, scared children, music plays why do horror movies make money but not games background, possessions, shadows and Bot jump scares Time to write something new!!!

Let’s go people! I can tell you one area that hasn’t been overused. People are always looking at the antagonist to carry the horror, but really it’s the setting that dictates much of the fear factor.

For instance, make horror films based in a location where there is maje simple escape, and make them claustrophobic. My favourite example of this is the game Penumbra, where you start off in a simple mine in frozen area of Greenland.

As the mine goes deeper and deeper it turns into a bizarre facility as you learn the history of the place, being used by the military in WW II and eventually by scientists in later years. In this example, the main enemies are simply wolves, a giant death worm, and extraterrestrials, but each and every one is equally terrifying albeit simple.

It has more to do with familiarity and digestibility. The concept of «scary» loses it’s value over time due to conditioning, more or. Computer generated gimmicks rarely help either because it’s generally perceived as super-imposed and falsified, further removing the audience from believability. Blood and gore are also rarely deemed «frightening,» just rather discomforting momey disgusting.

Psychology needs to be embraced more in production and writing than what will sell in a trailer. Jump-scares build intensity, so it’s usually sought after, but as you mentioned, it becomes dry. It should be done tastefully. If the film is paranormal or psycho-thriller in nature, then the antagonist ought to be avoided on screen.

Nor the audience’s imagination fill that void. Of course, acting needs to be on ,ake as wh. An actor’s behavior in a film needs to mone more realistically founded, and not frustratingly turned just to allow for a story to exist in a given environment. Even if the audience doesn’t believe in your story, play on natural human fear. Everyone can pretend to be tough, but write something that they go home beating themselves up.

Give enough depth to make it all seem plausible. Paranormal material, while subjective to each individual, is still favorable when it can be executed correctly.

Gmes is afraid of what they can’t see or understand. We can debate this statement, but curiosity and the rush that comes with it will always be a moviss of our nature.

This can be exploited, but you can’t humanize it or bring it to life with predictable or limited actions. I totally agree with the main ideas behind this video, though M. Night Shyamalan is a total hack and should be prevented from making any more movies. Don’t mean to take any validity away with this moviss I think the same can be said for all genres of films. There’s plenty of bad ones all the way. Horror just seems to get bullied more possibly rightfully so.

I don’t have much a stance on it. I think there are some gems out there. Of course, the quality of any horror film starts with the screenplay, and most horror screenplays fail to fully develop the characters. So, the result is a film that lacks any substance. The Exorcist is a character-driven film. My issues with horror. I’ve grown up. Most movies are aimed at 17 year olds. The ones being made, movoes mainstream, are not made by auteurs but by the likes of cash cows trying to hungry-hungry hippo profits.

Rec 3 was great, especially how pretty mondy turned out to be after they ditched the found footage format. VHS2 was anchored by that segment with the cult and the apocalypse in Safe Haven by Timo Tjahjanto who also had the best segment in ABC’s of Death and Gareth Huw Evans — in fact it was probably the greatest bit of horror I’ve horrir in the last years or so, like a frantic nightmare come to life. The reason older movies seem more frightening than the new ones is monney we’re adults .

9. Scream (1996)

An award-winning team of journalists, designers, and videographers who tell brand stories through Fast Company’s distinctive lens. Leaders who are shaping the future of business in creative ways. New workplaces, new food sources, new medicine—even an entirely new economic. When Jordan Peele won a best original screenplay Oscar for Get Out this year, it sent a message to everyone in Hollywood: Prestige horror is. Anointing it with an Oscar made it even more of a phenomenon that other filmmakers have become eager to replicate.

Fast Company

Over the years, a handful of commercially successful horror films have gone on to win the highest honor in Hollywoodland: Silence of the Lambs took home a Best Picture and Best Actor award for Jodie Foster; The Sixth Sense won for adapted screenplay; and, of course there was The Exorcistwhich was nominated for multiple Oscars and won two back in Thanks to their low budgets, horror films are generally profitable, which has long made them a Hollywood staple. Another plus: spooky movies tend to do well overseas, where scares transcend language and culture. In a world where major studios are making fewer movies to focus increasingly on IP-driven franchises that are more about brand names and established characters Marvel, DC Comics, Han Solo, Superman than the actors who play them, horror has become a new artistic haven for talent.